High School: 1957 vs 2010
HIGH SCHOOL -- 1957 vs. 2010Scenario 1: Jack goes duck hunting before school and then pulls into the school parking lot with his shotgun in his truck's gun rack. 1957 - Vice Principal comes over,...
View ArticleRe: High School: 1957 vs 2010
Given that 57% of crime guns can be traced to 1.2% of dealers what was the reasoning behind the Tiarht ruling that restricted law enforcement from dealing with this problem?...
View ArticleRe: High School: 1957 vs 2010
spiffingchap wrote:ChrisPat wrote:No one really expects anyone to list illegal income on their tax return, still less actually pay tax on it. It's a device to make a federal crime out of having...
View ArticleRe: High School: 1957 vs 2010
ChrisPat wrote:Al Capone didn't just fail to pay, he failed to file a correct declaration. An even more trivial bureaucratic misdemeanour.Using gun laws (or income tax laws) as a tool against other...
View ArticleRe: High School: 1957 vs 2010
Throd wrote:what was the reasoning behind the Tiarht ruling that restricted law enforcement from dealing with this problem? How does restricting BATF data to law enforcement agencies conducting...
View ArticleRe: High School: 1957 vs 2010
Suspect? Isn't everything suspect on this topic, none of the NRA affiliated groups or supporters are exactly neutral. Are you saying that the quotes from the ATF are lies?
View ArticleRe: High School: 1957 vs 2010
"gun victims action"- as if guns have "victims." The big fat assumed premise again.
View ArticleRe: High School: 1957 vs 2010
Throd wrote:Suspect? Isn't everything suspect on this topic, none of the NRA affiliated groups or supporters are exactly neutral. And what have I posted from the NRA or an affiliated group? I do note...
View ArticleRe: High School: 1957 vs 2010
The best reply to your question is as follows:www.protect.org/sites/all/files/docs/FactCheck.Tiahrt.pdf?phpMyAdmin=54bc4f2073fft1a50591f&phpMyAdmin=1bdc511d10f2td866af6I meant that almost all...
View ArticleRe: High School: 1957 vs 2010
Throd wrote:The best reply to your question is as follows:A liberal activist site quoting another one. Well, that's definitive. Or you could read the actual legislation.
View ArticleRe: High School: 1957 vs 2010
Is what they are saying wrong, are they lying about all the other objecting groups?Where did you get your 2% quote from, the actual report?
View ArticleRe: High School: 1957 vs 2010
Throd wrote: Is what they are saying wrong, are they lying about all the other objecting groups?Oh they're almost certainly lying, mostly, I suspect, by cherry-picking and spinning the actual data....
View ArticleRe: High School: 1957 vs 2010
A lesson on why one should refer to original sources rather than memory. It turns out, I did cite where I got my 2% figure in the post where I mentioned it. I didn't post a link at that time, but...
View ArticleRe: High School: 1957 vs 2010
You'll never know will you?Good of you to admit to a closed mind, I'm sure you find it comforting.
View ArticleRe: High School: 1957 vs 2010
Throd wrote: You'll never know will you?Good of you to admit to a closed mind, I'm sure you find it comforting.Oh, I've seen enough nonsense peddled by politicians and activists to know better than to...
View ArticleRe: High School: 1957 vs 2010
Not really, just pointing out that just because a lot of people in this self selected pool agree with your views doesn't make you right, or even in a majority in the wider world.I strongly suspect...
View ArticleRe: High School: 1957 vs 2010
Throd wrote:PS. I knew where the 2% came from too, that's why I got the date right. Doesn't mean I actually read it though.Yes. You'll read agit-prop but not source documents.
View ArticleRe: High School: 1957 vs 2010
You won't even read the agit-prop documents.Mind you I expect you'd condemn the source document too if you disagreed with it. My point was we've only your word that you actually read the document in...
View ArticleRe: High School: 1957 vs 2010
Throd wrote: You won't even read the agit-prop documents.And why should I when by definition agit-prop is misleading?Mind you I expect you'd condemn the source document too if you disagreed with it....
View Article
More Pages to Explore .....